Google Pushes for Weaker Copyright Rules in AI Policy Proposal

Google’s Proposal for AI Development

Google has released policy recommendations in response to the Trump administration’s AI Action Plan. The company advocates for promoting technical standards, adopting AI more quickly, and investing more in AI infrastructure. A key aspect of Google’s proposal is its stance on intellectual property (IP) and AI model training. Google asserts that “fair use and text-and-data mining exceptions” should be protected under U.S. law to facilitate AI research and development. According to Google, AI models should be able to train on publicly available copyrighted data without requiring additional permissions or licensing agreements.

Read More About Our Article of China Unveils Manus AI: A Game-Changer in Artificial Intelligence Published on March 12, 2025 SquaredTech

Fair Use and Text-and-Data Mining Exceptions

Google emphasizes that balanced copyright rules, such as fair use and text-and-data mining exceptions, have been critical to enabling AI systems to learn from prior knowledge and publicly available data, unlocking scientific and social advances. These exceptions allow for the use of copyrighted, publicly available material for AI training without significantly impacting rights holders and avoid often highly unpredictable, imbalanced, and lengthy negotiations with data holders during model development or scientific experimentation. Balanced copyright laws that ensure access to publicly available scientific papers, for example, are essential for accelerating AI in science, particularly for applications that sift through scientific literature for insights or new hypotheses.

Opposition from Creators and Media Organizations

This stance has sparked strong opposition from publishers, content creators, and media organizations. Many argue that AI companies should compensate rights holders when using their content. They express concern that if AI companies can freely train their models on publicly available copyrighted material, it could set a precedent where content creators lose control over their intellectual property, benefiting only the tech giants. Google is currently facing multiple lawsuits from organizations claiming that the company trained AI models on copyrighted material without authorization. The U.S. courts have not yet ruled on whether the fair use doctrine legally protects AI developers in such cases.

Concerns About Export Controls

In addition to copyright concerns, Google has expressed reservations about export controls on AI-related technologies, particularly those introduced under the Biden administration. The company warns that some of these measures could hinder U.S. competitiveness in the AI sector, especially for cloud service providers and AI chip manufacturers. Google takes issue with policies that place heavy restrictions on the export of AI chips and other key technologies, arguing that these measures could place U.S. companies at a disadvantage in the global market. The company’s position stands in contrast to Microsoft, which in January stated that it was “confident” it could comply with the regulations without disrupting its business operations.

Call for Increased Government Investment

Additionally, Google is advocating for expanded government funding and investment for AI research and development. The company calls for increased investment in early-stage AI projects and wider accessibility to computing resources for scientists and academic institutions. It also suggests that the government should release more public datasets to help drive AI research and innovation.

Read More About Our Article of U.S. Department of Justice Pushes for Google to Sell Chrome, Softens Stance on AI Investments Published on March 10, 2025 SquaredTech

Industry Reactions and Legal Actions

The proposal has ignited a debate within the creative and media industries. Over 400 entertainment industry figures, including notable celebrities like Ben Stiller, Mark Ruffalo, and Paul McCartney, have signed a letter opposing Google’s proposals to allow AI to train on copyrighted content without proper licensing. The letter argues that permitting these companies to use such material without compensating creators would exploit America’s creative industries and calls for maintaining current copyright protections. The document emphasizes that America’s leadership in AI should not undermine its arts and entertainment sector, which is crucial for democratic influence. This action follows recent discussions between Google and the White House about the future of AI, with the company advocating for more relaxed copyright laws to enhance AI innovation and competitiveness. The group plans to continue gathering signatures and providing updates to the White House.

Furthermore, over 60 newspapers owned by Alden Global Capital, including the New York Daily News, Chicago Tribune, and Denver Post, have published a unified editorial arguing against such proposals, warning that it could devastate the news and other creative industries. They argue that AI companies should negotiate licenses for using copyrighted materials, similar to other industries. This collective stand follows a similar movement last year supporting California’s AI safety bill, which Governor Gavin Newsom subsequently vetoed.

Legal Precedents and Ongoing Debates

The debate over fair use in AI training is ongoing. A recent federal court ruling in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS reaffirmed that the use of copyrighted material for AI training without payment does not qualify as fair use. Following this decision, Google has urged the White House to relax copyright laws to boost U.S. AI development. However, significant investment is already flowing into AI research, indicating these companies can afford to pay for the necessary resources. News Corp and The New York Times have taken legal actions to protect their content from being used without compensation. Critics argue that tech companies should not be given special privileges to infringe on intellectual property rights under the guise of national interest.

Sources: New York Post, The Verge

Conclusion

Google’s proposal to weaken copyright rules for AI development has sparked a significant debate among tech companies, content creators, and legal experts. While Google argues that such measures are essential for AI advancement and competitiveness, opponents fear that loosening copyright protections could harm creative industries and undermine intellectual property rights. As AI technology continues to evolve, finding a balance between innovation and protecting creators’ rights remains a critical challenge.

Stay Updated: Tech News – Artificial Intelligence – Google